User talk:JadeDragon - Revision history

JadeDragon: /* Zero State Link */ new section

2015-10-13T08:14:55Z

Zero State Link: new section

JadeDragon: /* Conference Level Honors only in NAD */

2015-09-18T19:42:43Z

Conference Level Honors only in NAD

W126jep: /* Conference Level Honors only in NAD */ new section

2015-09-18T19:31:41Z

Conference Level Honors only in NAD: new section

JadeDragon: /* Editing User Pages */

2014-11-25T03:03:56Z

Editing User Pages

W126jep: /* Editing User Pages */

2014-11-25T02:57:47Z

Editing User Pages

Jomegat: /* Editing User Pages */ new section

2014-11-25T02:54:25Z

Editing User Pages: new section

JadeDragon: /* IA Updates */

2014-11-21T02:17:07Z

IA Updates

W126jep: /* IA Updates */

2014-11-21T01:54:19Z

IA Updates

Jomegat at 01:47, 21 November 2014

2014-11-21T01:47:37Z

JadeDragon: /* IA Updates */

2014-11-21T00:49:24Z

IA Updates

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 13 October 2015
Line 137:		Line 137:
	Hi, JadeDragon. Please see the [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional talk page] for the Regional honors page. Back in January, the different division honors that were only at the conference level had to be removed. The original Regional page looked like [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php?title=Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional&oldid=103838 this]. While I would love to see the Coquí honor added in there (being that it is from my home), AY honors at the conference level from different divisions besides NAD are not displayed in the menu. The pages still exist and can be accessed, but there are no links to them directly. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 15:31, 18 September 2015 (EDT)		Hi, JadeDragon. Please see the [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional talk page] for the Regional honors page. Back in January, the different division honors that were only at the conference level had to be removed. The original Regional page looked like [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php?title=Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional&oldid=103838 this]. While I would love to see the Coquí honor added in there (being that it is from my home), AY honors at the conference level from different divisions besides NAD are not displayed in the menu. The pages still exist and can be accessed, but there are no links to them directly. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 15:31, 18 September 2015 (EDT)
	Missed that, thanks. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 15:42, 18 September 2015 (EDT)		Missed that, thanks. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 15:42, 18 September 2015 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Zero State Link ==
		+
		+	http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php/Category:Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Stage_0

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 18 September 2015
Line 136:		Line 136:

	Hi, JadeDragon. Please see the [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional talk page] for the Regional honors page. Back in January, the different division honors that were only at the conference level had to be removed. The original Regional page looked like [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php?title=Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional&oldid=103838 this]. While I would love to see the Coquí honor added in there (being that it is from my home), AY honors at the conference level from different divisions besides NAD are not displayed in the menu. The pages still exist and can be accessed, but there are no links to them directly. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 15:31, 18 September 2015 (EDT)		Hi, JadeDragon. Please see the [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional talk page] for the Regional honors page. Back in January, the different division honors that were only at the conference level had to be removed. The original Regional page looked like [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php?title=Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional&oldid=103838 this]. While I would love to see the Coquí honor added in there (being that it is from my home), AY honors at the conference level from different divisions besides NAD are not displayed in the menu. The pages still exist and can be accessed, but there are no links to them directly. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 15:31, 18 September 2015 (EDT)
		+	Missed that, thanks. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 15:42, 18 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 18 September 2015
Line 132:		Line 132:
	:It wasn't really a big deal, I just moved it to my talk page. Thanks for the concern though, and it is good practice for future reference. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 21:57, 24 November 2014 (EST)		:It wasn't really a big deal, I just moved it to my talk page. Thanks for the concern though, and it is good practice for future reference. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 21:57, 24 November 2014 (EST)
	::I thought I was on his talk - must be tired. Anyway I moved the whole conversation to the template page [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 22:03, 24 November 2014 (EST)		::I thought I was on his talk - must be tired. Anyway I moved the whole conversation to the template page [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 22:03, 24 November 2014 (EST)
		+
		+	== Conference Level Honors only in NAD ==
		+
		+	Hi, JadeDragon. Please see the [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional talk page] for the Regional honors page. Back in January, the different division honors that were only at the conference level had to be removed. The original Regional page looked like [http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php?title=Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Regional&oldid=103838 this]. While I would love to see the Coquí honor added in there (being that it is from my home), AY honors at the conference level from different divisions besides NAD are not displayed in the menu. The pages still exist and can be accessed, but there are no links to them directly. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 15:31, 18 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 25 November 2014
Line 131:		Line 131:
	User pages are kind of like a person's own house - they should not be edited except by the owner. I don't know how W126jep feels about that, but I do know that I would not like it if someone else edited my userpage. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 November 2014 (EST)		User pages are kind of like a person's own house - they should not be edited except by the owner. I don't know how W126jep feels about that, but I do know that I would not like it if someone else edited my userpage. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 November 2014 (EST)
	:It wasn't really a big deal, I just moved it to my talk page. Thanks for the concern though, and it is good practice for future reference. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 21:57, 24 November 2014 (EST)		:It wasn't really a big deal, I just moved it to my talk page. Thanks for the concern though, and it is good practice for future reference. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 21:57, 24 November 2014 (EST)
		+	::I thought I was on his talk - must be tired. Anyway I moved the whole conversation to the template page [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 22:03, 24 November 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 25 November 2014
Line 130:		Line 130:

	User pages are kind of like a person's own house - they should not be edited except by the owner. I don't know how W126jep feels about that, but I do know that I would not like it if someone else edited my userpage. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 November 2014 (EST)		User pages are kind of like a person's own house - they should not be edited except by the owner. I don't know how W126jep feels about that, but I do know that I would not like it if someone else edited my userpage. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 November 2014 (EST)
		+	:It wasn't really a big deal, I just moved it to my talk page. Thanks for the concern though, and it is good practice for future reference. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 21:57, 24 November 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:54, 25 November 2014
Line 126:		Line 126:
	::Collapsible box --> excellent. With a link to the honor page. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 20:54, 20 November 2014 (EST)		::Collapsible box --> excellent. With a link to the honor page. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 20:54, 20 November 2014 (EST)
	:::Yup, let's try one. See how it looks. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 21:17, 20 November 2014 (EST)		:::Yup, let's try one. See how it looks. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 21:17, 20 November 2014 (EST)
		+
		+	== Editing User Pages ==
		+
		+	User pages are kind of like a person's own house - they should not be edited except by the owner. I don't know how W126jep feels about that, but I do know that I would not like it if someone else edited my userpage. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 November 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 21 November 2014
Line 125:		Line 125:
	:What if we put the honor material in IA inside a collapsible box? My objection to having it in there as is, is that it breaks the typography - the honor requirements are sized for inclusion in an honor page, and I find them way too big for an IA page - they do not look like a subsection to an IA requirement, but in an IA page, that's what they are. That makes it difficult to separate the IA requirements from the honor requirements. I think a collapsible box might go a long way towards addressing that. Another approach would be to capture the honor requirements inside a single-cell, right-justified table set to ~80% width and with a light background color. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 20:47, 20 November 2014 (EST)		:What if we put the honor material in IA inside a collapsible box? My objection to having it in there as is, is that it breaks the typography - the honor requirements are sized for inclusion in an honor page, and I find them way too big for an IA page - they do not look like a subsection to an IA requirement, but in an IA page, that's what they are. That makes it difficult to separate the IA requirements from the honor requirements. I think a collapsible box might go a long way towards addressing that. Another approach would be to capture the honor requirements inside a single-cell, right-justified table set to ~80% width and with a light background color. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 20:47, 20 November 2014 (EST)
	::Collapsible box --> excellent. With a link to the honor page. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 20:54, 20 November 2014 (EST)		::Collapsible box --> excellent. With a link to the honor page. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 20:54, 20 November 2014 (EST)
		+	:::Yup, let's try one. See how it looks. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 21:17, 20 November 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 21 November 2014
Line 124:		Line 124:

	:What if we put the honor material in IA inside a collapsible box? My objection to having it in there as is, is that it breaks the typography - the honor requirements are sized for inclusion in an honor page, and I find them way too big for an IA page - they do not look like a subsection to an IA requirement, but in an IA page, that's what they are. That makes it difficult to separate the IA requirements from the honor requirements. I think a collapsible box might go a long way towards addressing that. Another approach would be to capture the honor requirements inside a single-cell, right-justified table set to ~80% width and with a light background color. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 20:47, 20 November 2014 (EST)		:What if we put the honor material in IA inside a collapsible box? My objection to having it in there as is, is that it breaks the typography - the honor requirements are sized for inclusion in an honor page, and I find them way too big for an IA page - they do not look like a subsection to an IA requirement, but in an IA page, that's what they are. That makes it difficult to separate the IA requirements from the honor requirements. I think a collapsible box might go a long way towards addressing that. Another approach would be to capture the honor requirements inside a single-cell, right-justified table set to ~80% width and with a light background color. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 20:47, 20 November 2014 (EST)
		+	::Collapsible box --> excellent. With a link to the honor page. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 20:54, 20 November 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:47, 21 November 2014
Line 122:		Line 122:

	I like showing the honor requirement where it is not quoted in the IA requirement - very good for the user. Following the translution idea that we can present repetitive info everywhere we need to show it I figured why not make the IA answers comprehensive instead of forcing the reader off to another area of the wiki. Some of these are "activity" type requirements, and across the project our answers on the "activity" requirements are often very weak. It's hard to give guidance on a 150 mile bike ride or on how to make a dive for example.[[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 19:49, 20 November 2014 (EST)		I like showing the honor requirement where it is not quoted in the IA requirement - very good for the user. Following the translution idea that we can present repetitive info everywhere we need to show it I figured why not make the IA answers comprehensive instead of forcing the reader off to another area of the wiki. Some of these are "activity" type requirements, and across the project our answers on the "activity" requirements are often very weak. It's hard to give guidance on a 150 mile bike ride or on how to make a dive for example.[[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 19:49, 20 November 2014 (EST)
		+
		+	:What if we put the honor material in IA inside a collapsible box? My objection to having it in there as is, is that it breaks the typography - the honor requirements are sized for inclusion in an honor page, and I find them way too big for an IA page - they do not look like a subsection to an IA requirement, but in an IA page, that's what they are. That makes it difficult to separate the IA requirements from the honor requirements. I think a collapsible box might go a long way towards addressing that. Another approach would be to capture the honor requirements inside a single-cell, right-justified table set to ~80% width and with a light background color. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 20:47, 20 November 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 21 November 2014
Line 120:		Line 120:
	::::I like what you did with the ACS/ADRA requirements. As for the printing, there is markup to make sections print but not display: <nowiki><span class="printonly">foo</span></nowiki>. As you might imagine, there is also a way to make a section display but not print. What do you think of suppressing the display of the answers, but including them in a printout? --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 18:56, 20 November 2014 (EST)		::::I like what you did with the ACS/ADRA requirements. As for the printing, there is markup to make sections print but not display: <nowiki><span class="printonly">foo</span></nowiki>. As you might imagine, there is also a way to make a section display but not print. What do you think of suppressing the display of the answers, but including them in a printout? --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 18:56, 20 November 2014 (EST)
	:::::Honestly, I like option b. The booklets most of the time actually quote the requirements and leave space for the answer to be written in. I think quoting the requirement and then linking to the answer is the best way to present the information. As for answers being included in a printout, it sounds interesting, but some type of message would have to be added to let the reader know. Sometimes a reader might only have two pages to print on, and suddenly they need four or five without knowing it. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 19:01, 20 November 2014 (EST)		:::::Honestly, I like option b. The booklets most of the time actually quote the requirements and leave space for the answer to be written in. I think quoting the requirement and then linking to the answer is the best way to present the information. As for answers being included in a printout, it sounds interesting, but some type of message would have to be added to let the reader know. Sometimes a reader might only have two pages to print on, and suddenly they need four or five without knowing it. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 19:01, 20 November 2014 (EST)
		+
		+	I like showing the honor requirement where it is not quoted in the IA requirement - very good for the user. Following the translution idea that we can present repetitive info everywhere we need to show it I figured why not make the IA answers comprehensive instead of forcing the reader off to another area of the wiki. Some of these are "activity" type requirements, and across the project our answers on the "activity" requirements are often very weak. It's hard to give guidance on a 150 mile bike ride or on how to make a dive for example.[[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 19:49, 20 November 2014 (EST)